Hotjar vs Workable

Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hotjar (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 35). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Workable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Workable is slightly ahead of Hotjar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Workable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Workable is slightly ahead of Hotjar.

Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Workable's footprint is roughly 15.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Workable looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.