Hotjar vs Wrike

Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hotjar (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 34). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is ahead of Wrike. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hotjar is ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wrike is slightly ahead of Hotjar.

Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Wrike's footprint is roughly 5.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wrike looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.