HubSpot vs Jamf

HubSpot and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

HubSpot (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 40). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is slightly ahead of HubSpot. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is slightly ahead of HubSpot.

HubSpot carries 53,481 GitHub stars across 381 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 6.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

HubSpot is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Jamf looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.