HubSpot vs LogRocket

HubSpot and LogRocket (Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

HubSpot (rank #93) holds a modest lead over LogRocket (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 42). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is ahead of LogRocket. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LogRocket is ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), HubSpot is ahead of LogRocket. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of LogRocket. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is ahead of LogRocket.

HubSpot carries 53,481 GitHub stars across 381 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. LogRocket shows 6,668 stars across 16 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 8.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

HubSpot is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. LogRocket looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.