HubSpot vs Metabase
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
HubSpot and Metabase both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
HubSpot (rank #93) holds a narrow lead over Metabase (rank #165) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 51). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is slightly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is slightly ahead of HubSpot. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Metabase. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is slightly ahead of HubSpot.
HubSpot carries 53,481 GitHub stars across 381 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Metabase shows 50,225 stars across 100 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors.
HubSpot is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Metabase looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HubSpot | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #165 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 51 |
| Code | 55 | 49 |
| Education | 52 | 80 |
| Community | 35 | 39 |
| Reach | 95 | 41 |
| Momentum | 54 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 53,481 | 50,225 |
| Forks | 6,864 | 7,167 |
| Public repos | 381 | 100 |
| Active repos (90d) | 35 | 21 |
| External contributors | 4 | 49 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 30 |