HubSpot vs Qualtrics
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
HubSpot and Qualtrics both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
HubSpot (rank #93) holds a meaningful lead over Qualtrics (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 31). The gap of 25 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), HubSpot is ahead of Qualtrics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is ahead of Qualtrics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Qualtrics.
HubSpot carries 53,481 GitHub stars across 381 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Qualtrics shows 20 stars across 20 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 2674.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
HubSpot is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qualtrics makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HubSpot | Qualtrics |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 31 |
| Code | 55 | 27 |
| Education | 52 | 40 |
| Community | 35 | 14 |
| Reach | 95 | 82 |
| Momentum | 54 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 53,481 | 20 |
| Forks | 6,864 | 13 |
| Public repos | 381 | 20 |
| Active repos (90d) | 35 | 7 |
| External contributors | 4 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 28 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 19 |