HubSpot vs Starling Bank

HubSpot and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

HubSpot (rank #93) holds a meaningful lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 33). The gap of 23 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is slightly ahead of Starling Bank.

HubSpot carries 53,481 GitHub stars across 381 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 274.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

HubSpot is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Starling Bank looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.