HubSpot vs UptimeRobot
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
HubSpot and UptimeRobot (Leading Uptime Monitoring Service) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
HubSpot (rank #93) holds a modest lead over UptimeRobot (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 37). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is ahead of UptimeRobot. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UptimeRobot is ahead of HubSpot. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of UptimeRobot. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is slightly ahead of UptimeRobot.
HubSpot carries 53,481 GitHub stars across 381 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. UptimeRobot shows 81 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 660.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
HubSpot is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. UptimeRobot looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HubSpot | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 37 |
| Code | 55 | 38 |
| Education | 52 | 62 |
| Community | 35 | 35 |
| Reach | 95 | 28 |
| Momentum | 54 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 53,481 | 81 |
| Forks | 6,864 | 24 |
| Public repos | 381 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 35 | 6 |
| External contributors | 4 | 10 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 37 |