A better workplace starts here
Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.
Humaans vs MailerLite
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Humaans (A better workplace starts here) and MailerLite (Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
MailerLite (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Humaans (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 32). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), MailerLite is slightly ahead of Humaans. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Humaans is ahead of MailerLite. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), MailerLite is ahead of Humaans. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), MailerLite is ahead of Humaans. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), MailerLite is ahead of Humaans.
Humaans carries 461 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. MailerLite shows 1,134 stars across 39 public repos, 25 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Humaans is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. MailerLite looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Humaans | MailerLite |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 40 |
| Code | 50 | 52 |
| Education | 71 | 55 |
| Community | 16 | 28 |
| Reach | 0 | 15 |
| Momentum | 24 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 461 | 1,134 |
| Forks | 18 | 288 |
| Public repos | 9 | 39 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 25 |
| External contributors | 2 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 44 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 46 |