Humaans vs Skyscanner

Humaans (A better workplace starts here) and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Humaans (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 32). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Humaans. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Humaans. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Humaans. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Humaans. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of Humaans.

Humaans carries 461 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 17.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Humaans is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Skyscanner looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.