Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.
IFTTT vs InVision
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
IFTTT (Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.) and InVision both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
IFTTT and InVision sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (40), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), InVision is slightly ahead of IFTTT. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), IFTTT is ahead of InVision. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), IFTTT is ahead of InVision. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), IFTTT is slightly ahead of InVision.
IFTTT carries 15,307 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. InVision shows 1,303 stars across 114 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but IFTTT's footprint is roughly 11.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
IFTTT is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. InVision looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | IFTTT | InVision |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 40 |
| Code | 46 | 46 |
| Education | 72 | 80 |
| Community | 31 | 14 |
| Reach | 56 | 40 |
| Momentum | 2 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 15,307 | 1,303 |
| Forks | 1,499 | 193 |
| Public repos | 75 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 0 |
| External contributors | 2 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 34 |