Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.
IFTTT vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
IFTTT (Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.) and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
IFTTT and Jamf sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (40), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), IFTTT is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), IFTTT is slightly ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is ahead of IFTTT. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), IFTTT is ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of IFTTT.
IFTTT carries 15,307 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
IFTTT is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | IFTTT | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 40 |
| Code | 46 | 33 |
| Education | 72 | 68 |
| Community | 31 | 41 |
| Reach | 56 | 44 |
| Momentum | 2 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 15,307 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 1,499 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 75 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 20 |
| External contributors | 2 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 21 |