IFTTT vs sendinblue (now Brevo)

IFTTT (Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.) and sendinblue (now Brevo) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

sendinblue (now Brevo) (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over IFTTT (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 40). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of IFTTT. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of IFTTT. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), IFTTT is ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), IFTTT is clearly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), IFTTT is slightly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo).

IFTTT carries 15,307 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. sendinblue (now Brevo) shows 653 stars across 37 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but IFTTT's footprint is roughly 23.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

IFTTT is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. sendinblue (now Brevo) looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.