Increase vs Iterable

Increase (Build your bank) and Iterable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Increase (rank #55) holds a modest lead over Iterable (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 44). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Increase is slightly ahead of Iterable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Increase is clearly ahead of Iterable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Increase is clearly ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is ahead of Increase.

Increase carries 45 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Iterable shows 269 stars across 100 public repos, 16 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Iterable's footprint is roughly 6.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Increase is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Iterable looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.