Build your bank
Increase vs Quo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Increase (Build your bank) and Quo (World's best business phone app) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Increase (rank #55) holds a meaningful lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 33). The gap of 27 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Increase is ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Increase is ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Increase is clearly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Increase is clearly ahead of Quo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Increase is slightly ahead of Quo.
Increase carries 45 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Quo shows 12 stars across 20 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Increase's footprint is roughly 3.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Increase is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Quo makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Increase | Quo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #55 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 60 | 33 |
| Code | 52 | 32 |
| Education | 59 | 43 |
| Community | 68 | 11 |
| Reach | 79 | 44 |
| Momentum | 43 | 41 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 45 | 12 |
| Forks | 15 | 1 |
| Public repos | 12 | 20 |
| Active repos (90d) | 11 | 2 |
| External contributors | 5 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 28 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 39 |