Build your bank
Increase vs Zulip
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Increase (Build your bank) and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Increase (rank #55) holds a meaningful lead over Zulip (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 36). The gap of 24 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zulip is ahead of Increase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Increase is ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Increase is clearly ahead of Zulip. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Increase is clearly ahead of Zulip. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Increase is slightly ahead of Zulip.
Increase carries 45 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zulip's footprint is roughly 717.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Increase is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zulip looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Increase | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #55 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 60 | 36 |
| Code | 52 | 64 |
| Education | 59 | 49 |
| Community | 68 | 47 |
| Reach | 79 | 25 |
| Momentum | 43 | 38 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 45 | 32,299 |
| Forks | 15 | 14,237 |
| Public repos | 12 | 67 |
| Active repos (90d) | 11 | 9 |
| External contributors | 5 | 76 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 67 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 38 |