Instructure, Inc. vs Jamf

Instructure, Inc. and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Instructure, Inc. (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 40). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Instructure, Inc. is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Instructure, Inc. is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is ahead of Instructure, Inc..

Instructure, Inc. carries 10,186 GitHub stars across 212 public repos, with 37 repositories active in the last 90 days and 29 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Instructure, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.