Instructure, Inc. vs ReadMe

Instructure, Inc. and ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ReadMe (rank #257) holds a narrow lead over Instructure, Inc. (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 44). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Instructure, Inc. is slightly ahead of ReadMe. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Instructure, Inc..

Instructure, Inc. carries 10,186 GitHub stars across 212 public repos, with 37 repositories active in the last 90 days and 29 external contributors on record. ReadMe shows 1,824 stars across 106 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Instructure, Inc.'s footprint is roughly 5.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Instructure, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. ReadMe looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.