Instructure, Inc. vs Skyscanner

Instructure, Inc. and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a narrow lead over Instructure, Inc. (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 44). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Instructure, Inc. is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Instructure, Inc. is slightly ahead of Skyscanner.

Instructure, Inc. carries 10,186 GitHub stars across 212 public repos, with 37 repositories active in the last 90 days and 29 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors.

Instructure, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Skyscanner looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.