Instructure, Inc. vs Workable

Instructure, Inc. and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Instructure, Inc. (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 35). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Instructure, Inc. is slightly ahead of Workable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Workable is slightly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Instructure, Inc. is clearly ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Instructure, Inc. is ahead of Workable.

Instructure, Inc. carries 10,186 GitHub stars across 212 public repos, with 37 repositories active in the last 90 days and 29 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Instructure, Inc.'s footprint is roughly 13.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Instructure, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Workable looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.