Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Instructure, Inc. vs Zammad

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Instructure, Inc. and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a narrow lead over Instructure, Inc. (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 44). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is slightly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is clearly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Instructure, Inc. is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Instructure, Inc. is slightly ahead of Zammad.

Instructure, Inc. carries 10,186 GitHub stars across 212 public repos, with 37 repositories active in the last 90 days and 29 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.

Instructure, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricInstructure, Inc.Zammad
Ranking
Overall rank#317#152
Pillars
Overall4452
Code5663
Education5071
Community4570
Reach240
Momentum4339
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars10,1866,394
Forks4,1891,687
Public repos21211
Active repos (90d)379
External contributors2927
Avg polish5071
Avg AI-readiness4135

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Instructure, Inc. developer profileView Zammad developer profile