Powering prosperity around the world.
Intuit vs Lansweeper NV
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Intuit (Powering prosperity around the world.) and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Intuit (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 30). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Intuit is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Intuit is ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Intuit is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Intuit. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Intuit is ahead of Lansweeper NV.
Intuit carries 18,182 GitHub stars across 150 public repos, with 27 repositories active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Intuit is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Intuit | Lansweeper NV |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 30 |
| Code | 65 | 0 |
| Education | 76 | 60 |
| Community | 48 | 0 |
| Reach | 24 | 50 |
| Momentum | 37 | 28 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 18,182 | 0 |
| Forks | 4,233 | 0 |
| Public repos | 150 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 27 | 0 |
| External contributors | 40 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 0 |