Powering prosperity around the world.
Intuit vs Miro
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Intuit (Powering prosperity around the world.) and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Intuit (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 38). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Intuit is slightly ahead of Miro. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of Intuit. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Intuit is ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Intuit is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Intuit is clearly ahead of Miro.
Intuit carries 18,182 GitHub stars across 150 public repos, with 27 repositories active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Intuit's footprint is roughly 21.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Intuit is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Intuit | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 38 |
| Code | 65 | 58 |
| Education | 76 | 86 |
| Community | 48 | 32 |
| Reach | 24 | 0 |
| Momentum | 37 | 8 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 18,182 | 843 |
| Forks | 4,233 | 380 |
| Public repos | 150 | 45 |
| Active repos (90d) | 27 | 4 |
| External contributors | 40 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 65 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 32 |