Powering prosperity around the world.
Intuit vs Razorpay
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Intuit (Powering prosperity around the world.) and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #31) holds a modest lead over Intuit (rank #237) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 48). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Intuit. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Intuit is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Intuit is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Intuit. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Intuit.
Intuit carries 18,182 GitHub stars across 150 public repos, with 27 repositories active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,812 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Intuit's footprint is roughly 4.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Intuit is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Intuit | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #31 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 63 |
| Code | 65 | 68 |
| Education | 76 | 53 |
| Community | 48 | 44 |
| Reach | 24 | 58 |
| Momentum | 37 | 71 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 18,182 | 3,812 |
| Forks | 4,233 | 1,929 |
| Public repos | 150 | 177 |
| Active repos (90d) | 27 | 38 |
| External contributors | 40 | 33 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 69 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 49 |