Powering prosperity around the world.
Making the workplace a source of learning and purpose through knowledge-sharing. We're hiring!
Intuit vs Slab
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Intuit (Powering prosperity around the world.) and Slab (Making the workplace a source of learning and purpose through knowledge-sharing. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Intuit (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Slab (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 39). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Intuit is ahead of Slab. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Intuit is clearly ahead of Slab. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Intuit is slightly ahead of Slab. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Slab is slightly ahead of Intuit. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Intuit is clearly ahead of Slab.
Intuit carries 18,182 GitHub stars across 150 public repos, with 27 repositories active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors on record. Slab shows 49,433 stars across 28 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors.
Intuit is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Slab looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Intuit | Slab |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #455 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 39 |
| Code | 65 | 55 |
| Education | 76 | 53 |
| Community | 48 | 43 |
| Reach | 24 | 27 |
| Momentum | 37 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 18,182 | 49,433 |
| Forks | 4,233 | 3,982 |
| Public repos | 150 | 28 |
| Active repos (90d) | 27 | 0 |
| External contributors | 40 | 8 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 42 |