Powering prosperity around the world.
Intuit vs tray.ai
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Intuit (Powering prosperity around the world.) and tray.ai both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Intuit (rank #237) holds a modest lead over tray.ai (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 31). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Intuit is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Intuit is ahead of tray.ai. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Intuit is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Intuit is ahead of tray.ai. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Intuit is ahead of tray.ai.
Intuit carries 18,182 GitHub stars across 150 public repos, with 27 repositories active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors on record. tray.ai shows 300 stars across 49 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Intuit's footprint is roughly 60.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Intuit is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. tray.ai makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Intuit | tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 31 |
| Code | 65 | 43 |
| Education | 76 | 61 |
| Community | 48 | 18 |
| Reach | 24 | 4 |
| Momentum | 37 | 17 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 18,182 | 300 |
| Forks | 4,233 | 109 |
| Public repos | 150 | 49 |
| Active repos (90d) | 27 | 2 |
| External contributors | 40 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 33 |