InVision vs Jamf

InVision and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

InVision and Jamf sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (40), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), InVision is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), InVision is ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is clearly ahead of InVision. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is slightly ahead of InVision. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of InVision.

InVision carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 6.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

InVision is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.