InVision vs SmartRecruiters
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
InVision and SmartRecruiters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
InVision and SmartRecruiters sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (40), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SmartRecruiters is ahead of InVision. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), InVision is ahead of SmartRecruiters. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), InVision is slightly ahead of SmartRecruiters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SmartRecruiters is clearly ahead of InVision. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SmartRecruiters is slightly ahead of InVision.
InVision carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. SmartRecruiters shows 119 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but InVision's footprint is roughly 10.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
InVision is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. SmartRecruiters looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | InVision | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 40 |
| Code | 46 | 56 |
| Education | 80 | 65 |
| Community | 14 | 12 |
| Reach | 40 | 76 |
| Momentum | 0 | 6 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 119 |
| Forks | 193 | 17 |
| Public repos | 114 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 3 |
| External contributors | 0 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 37 |