World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
InVision vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
InVision and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over InVision (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 40). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is ahead of InVision. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), InVision is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of InVision. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of InVision. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of InVision.
InVision carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
InVision is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Teamwork.com looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | InVision | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 48 |
| Code | 46 | 58 |
| Education | 80 | 59 |
| Community | 14 | 37 |
| Reach | 40 | 47 |
| Momentum | 0 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 193 | 384 |
| Public repos | 114 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 14 |
| External contributors | 0 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 38 |