Building the world's most human financial company
InVision vs Wealthsimple
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
InVision and Wealthsimple (Building the world's most human financial company) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
InVision (rank #430) holds a modest lead over Wealthsimple (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 31). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wealthsimple is ahead of InVision. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), InVision is clearly ahead of Wealthsimple. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), InVision is slightly ahead of Wealthsimple. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wealthsimple is clearly ahead of InVision.
InVision carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Wealthsimple shows 138 stars across 102 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but InVision's footprint is roughly 9.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
InVision is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Wealthsimple looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | InVision | Wealthsimple |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 31 |
| Code | 46 | 58 |
| Education | 80 | 52 |
| Community | 14 | 9 |
| Reach | 40 | 40 |
| Momentum | 0 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 138 |
| Forks | 193 | 85 |
| Public repos | 114 | 102 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 4 |
| External contributors | 0 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 39 |