Iterable vs Moodle Development

Iterable and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Iterable (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 34). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Iterable is slightly ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Iterable is ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of Iterable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Moodle Development is ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is clearly ahead of Moodle Development.

Iterable carries 269 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Moodle Development's footprint is roughly 27.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Iterable is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Moodle Development looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.