Iterable vs Qonto

Iterable and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Iterable (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Qonto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Iterable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of Iterable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Iterable is ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is slightly ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is clearly ahead of Qonto.

Iterable carries 269 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Iterable is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.