Iterable vs Razorpay

Iterable and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over Iterable (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 44). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of Iterable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Iterable is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of Iterable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is ahead of Iterable.

Iterable carries 269 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 14.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Iterable is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.