Iterable vs Semrush

Iterable and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Iterable and Semrush sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (44), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Iterable is slightly ahead of Semrush. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Semrush is slightly ahead of Iterable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is slightly ahead of Iterable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is clearly ahead of Semrush.

Iterable carries 269 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.

Iterable is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Semrush looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.