Iterable vs Teamwork.com

Iterable and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Iterable (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 44). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Iterable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Iterable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com.

Iterable carries 269 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Teamwork.com's footprint is roughly 7.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Iterable is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.