Jamf vs draw.io

Jamf and draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 40). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), draw.io is slightly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is slightly ahead of draw.io. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is slightly ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of draw.io.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. draw.io shows 86,983 stars across 32 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 10.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. draw.io looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.