Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Jamf vs Lansweeper NV

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Jamf and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jamf (rank #430) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 30). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Jamf is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Lansweeper NV looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricJamfLansweeper NV
Ranking
Overall rank#430#728
Pillars
Overall4030
Code330
Education6860
Community410
Reach4450
Momentum6128
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars7,9460
Forks1,5470
Public repos1140
Active repos (90d)200
External contributors50
Avg polish450
Avg AI-readiness210

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Jamf developer profileView Lansweeper NV developer profile