Jamf vs Miro

Jamf and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 38). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Miro.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 9.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.