Powerful, self-serve product analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users.
Jamf vs Mixpanel, Inc
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Jamf and Mixpanel, Inc (Powerful, self-serve product analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Mixpanel, Inc (rank #82) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (57 vs 40). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Mixpanel, Inc is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Mixpanel, Inc is slightly ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mixpanel, Inc is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Mixpanel, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is ahead of Mixpanel, Inc.
Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Mixpanel, Inc shows 5,611 stars across 84 public repos, 51 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.
Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Mixpanel, Inc looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Jamf | Mixpanel, Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #82 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 57 |
| Code | 33 | 58 |
| Education | 68 | 70 |
| Community | 41 | 45 |
| Reach | 44 | 15 |
| Momentum | 61 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,946 | 5,611 |
| Forks | 1,547 | 2,660 |
| Public repos | 114 | 84 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 51 |
| External contributors | 5 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 54 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 58 |