Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Jamf vs Open edX

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Jamf and Open edX (The community-driven, open-source project powering edX.org and thousands of other online education sites around the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Open edX (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 40). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Open edX is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is clearly ahead of Open edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Open edX is ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Open edX. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Open edX is slightly ahead of Jamf.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Open edX shows 10,654 stars across 186 public repos, 100 active in the last 90 days and 91 external contributors.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Open edX looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricJamfOpen edX
Ranking
Overall rank#430#372
Pillars
Overall4042
Code3369
Education6842
Community4151
Reach4410
Momentum6167
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars7,94610,654
Forks1,5478,888
Public repos114186
Active repos (90d)20100
External contributors591
Avg polish4576
Avg AI-readiness2139

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Jamf developer profileView Open edX developer profile