Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Jamf vs Proton Mail

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Jamf and Proton Mail both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Proton Mail (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 40). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Proton Mail is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is clearly ahead of Proton Mail. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Proton Mail is slightly ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is ahead of Proton Mail.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Proton Mail shows 16,265 stars across 186 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Proton Mail looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricJamfProton Mail
Ranking
Overall rank#430#401
Pillars
Overall4041
Code3364
Education6842
Community4146
Reach4444
Momentum6152
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars7,94616,265
Forks1,5472,240
Public repos114186
Active repos (90d)2019
External contributors520
Avg polish4574
Avg AI-readiness2132

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Jamf developer profileView Proton Mail developer profile