Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Jamf vs Razorpay

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Jamf and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 40). The gap of 23 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is ahead of Jamf.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricJamfRazorpay
Ranking
Overall rank#430#30
Pillars
Overall4063
Code3368
Education6853
Community4144
Reach4458
Momentum6171
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars7,9463,811
Forks1,5471,932
Public repos114177
Active repos (90d)2038
External contributors532
Avg polish4569
Avg AI-readiness2149

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Jamf developer profileView Razorpay developer profile