Jamf vs Rippling

Jamf and Rippling (We make it unbelievably easy to manage your team's payroll, benefits, computers, and apps.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Rippling (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 39). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Rippling is slightly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of Rippling. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is ahead of Rippling. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Rippling is ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Rippling.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Rippling shows 156 stars across 11 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 50.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Rippling looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.