Jamf vs segment
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Jamf and segment both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over segment (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 35). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Jamf is clearly ahead of segment. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is slightly ahead of segment. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is clearly ahead of segment. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), segment is ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of segment.
Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. segment shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. segment looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Jamf | segment |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 35 |
| Code | 33 | 0 |
| Education | 68 | 60 |
| Community | 41 | 11 |
| Reach | 44 | 57 |
| Momentum | 61 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,946 | 0 |
| Forks | 1,547 | 0 |
| Public repos | 114 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 0 |
| External contributors | 5 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 0 |