Jamf vs sendinblue (now Brevo)

Jamf and sendinblue (now Brevo) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

sendinblue (now Brevo) (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 40). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), sendinblue (now Brevo) is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is clearly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo).

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. sendinblue (now Brevo) shows 653 stars across 37 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 12.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. sendinblue (now Brevo) looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.