Jamf vs Sophos
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Jamf and Sophos both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Sophos (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 37). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is slightly ahead of Sophos. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Sophos. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is ahead of Sophos.
Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Sophos shows 1,438 stars across 84 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 5.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sophos makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Jamf | Sophos |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 37 |
| Code | 33 | 33 |
| Education | 68 | 68 |
| Community | 41 | 33 |
| Reach | 44 | 11 |
| Momentum | 61 | 42 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,946 | 1,438 |
| Forks | 1,547 | 432 |
| Public repos | 114 | 84 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 7 |
| External contributors | 5 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 22 |