Jamf vs Tealium Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Jamf and Tealium Inc. (Tealium is the data hub for digital business.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Jamf and Tealium Inc. sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (40), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Tealium Inc. is slightly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is clearly ahead of Tealium Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Tealium Inc. is clearly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Tealium Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is slightly ahead of Tealium Inc..
Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Tealium Inc. shows 212 stars across 130 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 37.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Tealium Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Jamf | Tealium Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 40 |
| Code | 33 | 34 |
| Education | 68 | 40 |
| Community | 41 | 62 |
| Reach | 44 | 16 |
| Momentum | 61 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,946 | 212 |
| Forks | 1,547 | 231 |
| Public repos | 114 | 130 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 13 |
| External contributors | 5 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 43 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 27 |