Jamf vs Typeform

Jamf and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 40). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is slightly ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Typeform.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 13.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.