Jamf vs Wrike

Jamf and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 34). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wrike is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 28.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Wrike looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.