Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Jamf vs Zoom

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Jamf and Zoom (Power Up Your Apps with Video, Phone, and Chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zoom (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 40). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zoom is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zoom is ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is slightly ahead of Zoom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is slightly ahead of Zoom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zoom is ahead of Jamf.

Jamf carries 7,946 GitHub stars across 114 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zoom shows 3,380 stars across 159 public repos, 62 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.

Jamf is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Zoom looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricJamfZoom
Ranking
Overall rank#430#122
Pillars
Overall4054
Code3352
Education6878
Community4135
Reach4438
Momentum6177
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars7,9463,380
Forks1,5471,526
Public repos114159
Active repos (90d)2062
External contributors54
Avg polish4563
Avg AI-readiness2130

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Jamf developer profileView Zoom developer profile